This post is really a follow-up/extension of our now somewhat infamous - and often mentioned - BENGHAZI-TRUTH GUIDE TO STEALTH ONLINE LIBERAL TROLLS PRETENDING TO BE CONSERVATIVE If you haven't read it, I suggest you do.
IF YOU CAME TO READ ABOUT BOSS HOGG, HARRIET, DAKOTA, & TROLL PALS UNDER THE TWITTER HASHTAG "#justiceforbenghazi4"CLEARLY AND UNFAIRLY SUSPENDING CONSERVATIVES, INCLUDING THIS BLOG'S AUTHOR, ON TWITTER, SCROLL DOWN TO THE GREEN
9/27/2013 - now updated with more bile from the trolls -screenshots! Plus a surprise about
"Conservative" actor James Woods! Updates in blue
UPDATE OCT 6, 2013 - IMO THE MOST AMAZING AND JAW-DROPPING SCREENSHOTS YET. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY READ THIS WHOLE ARTICLE, SCROLL ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE PURPLE! OCT 9, MORE SCREENSHOTS!
An amazing couple of facts presented themselves on a silver platter for all to see yesterday - yet no one else seems to have seen the significance except Tea Party Fire Ant members. Not that these facts were a surprise. Not, at least, if you read the above-linked article. What makes them amazing is that the trolls are dropping their masquerades to an astonishing degree - or are not trolls demonstrating IMO a seeming impossible disconnection from all reality. It's impossible to know if they are so confident they don't care, or are themselves so fed up with Obama they do just enough to earn their Soros-money.
1. It's pretty clear IMO that "Special Operations Speaks" management is entirely off the rails on the Benghazi Select Committee. We told you about this before but the extent to which they are now mocking and deriding Rep Wolf's HRes36 demanding a Benghazi Select committee while pushing HRes306 the sole purpose of which is to see HRes36 passed in the House. Make sense? No, of course not. Unless, that is, if you understand that it's a very good way to never get a Benghazi select Committee, since HRes306 is a Discharge petition which has, as of this writing 6 co-sponsors. the original HRes36 as you all know has 174 (Edit: now at 177), or 3/4 of the GOP House.
In this screenshot you can see Special Ops twitter account both deride HRes36 while admitting to HRes306 having only 4 co-sponsors
It's not the first time:
I have been really torn on the following for the embarrassment factor - particularly for the 1,000 vets who signed their petition - IMO requested by SOS to give a False Flag operation the unimpeachable cred of their service - but it must be shown. I will spare the gory screenshots - for now. Here's what the Special Ops Speaks admin DM'd me and told Kathy Amidon independently on the telephone:
H. Res 36 is dead in the water. Boehner refuses to bring it to the floor and Boehner won't form the Select Committee himself. It's useless
H. Res 306 goes around Boehner and forces a floor vote on H. Res 36. (Editor: TPFA thought this initially and worked for a few weeks on it before Spec Ops Speaks even existed and we learned shortly that that's all wrong - Discharge petitions never pass and would send Wolf back to the drawing board, not ensure an automatic passage and implementation) Please listen to me, I've worked in the House before and know
what I"m talking about.
Wolf has turned coward on us and is in Boehner's pocket. He is of no use to us anymore. If he really did want to force H. Res 36 to the
floor for a vote, he would have signed on to the Discharge Petition / H. Res 306
(Except if Wolf was in Boehner's pocket he would have pulled HRes36 already and not sent letters of thanks to us for continually getting more co-sponsors on the bill which is putting a great deal of pressure on Boehner now - we get that from inside several congressional offices. SOS's assertion here that Wolf wants to block a resolution that would otherwise send his own bill to victory is at the very best IMO a stupidly illogical and absurdly paranoid fantasy)
Say and do what you want sir, but in this case...legislatively, you are wrong.
Wolf is not our ally anymore. He is working for Boehner and has not intention anymore of getting a Select Committee.
In all truth, every Republican SHOULD be on board with both pieces of legislation.
We've had Wolf in conference calls and have given up trying to work with him. Wolf, Boehner, Cantor, the whole leadership is useless
(there is more)
A call to Wolf's office confirmed that no such conference call with Special Operations Speaks ever took place.
I was lucky to copy-paste and get screenshots of all this. When I told SOS we would check all his assertions with Wolf's office he deleted the DMs so fast I couldn't believe it.
Now this is what is to me the real tell-tale aspect that proves IMO that Special Ops Speaks is a derailment operation: they never say "Do both". If they were merely misguided, they would push for more reps on HRes36 and HRes306. Instead they effectively dismiss HRes36 and slam it's author who had nothing to do with HRes306. "Maybe they are too busy to do both". Okay, what have you seen them doing besides sharing stories? "Working behind the scenes?" You mean like the conference call to Wolf that absolutely, positively never happened?
The whole thing just stinks to high heaven. IMO if they are sincere, they are entirely incompetent to the point of virtual retardation. My own opinion is that they are a very carefully planned fake-out. Remember, Soros has billions and Benghazi would/can ruin Obama and the democrats with him ten times worse than Watergate did Nixon. Control of the most powerful nation in the world is something people spend money on. Don't mistake it. This looks to me like one of those things.
Benghazi-Truth challenges Special ops Speaks to recant their attacks on Wolf and HRes36 and push at least for both, with an emphasis on HRes36. Do not follow them to see what happens next - that only gives a group saying these kinds of things power that comes with the credibility of your support. We'll tell you when there is any news on it.
2. My my my! Look who is suspending conservatives! Why, if it isn't the same collective group that has been decrying that very activity. You have heard them endlessly: "My best friend is in Twitmo! Get them out!" "So-and-so's account has been hacked!" Endlessly, endlessly, endlessly, it's about almost nothing more than getting people out of Twitmo . This IMO is a duel strategy to make these people appear to be a "threat to the left" (despite the fact that they never do anything) while eating up moment after moment, hour after hour, day after day while Obama moves ahead unimpeded by the non-stop hollow ranting taking place in a chat bubble the rest of the world never hears.
You probably recall that I, myself, was accused by these people of "Suspending Boss Hogg." How I was supposed to accomplish alone, without ever interacting with him or them, this Ozian feat was never explained. Not that I didn't ask them to explain - I did, repeatedly - I just never got an answer. How I was supposed to do it supposedly completely alone since, according this knucklehead, Kathy and I are the same person, is an even greater mystery:
(Pretty good last line if I do say so myself. AHEM!)
You can see "Boss Hogg" himself perpetuating that unfounded lie even after being outed:
Considering "The Hogg" knows that this group, the Tea Party Fire ants, led by Kathy and myself, have received among several honors not one but two letters of thanks from congressman Wolf for this group's work on Benghazi (one more than almost anyone and two more than anyone), I don't see how anyone can consider Hogg as anything but an unmitigated bold-faced liar when he calls us "frauds", here. He knows better, clearly, and as usual offers no proof or specifics - everyone is supposed to take his word because he has, what I suspect from the disparity of his wall activity and the number of followers he has, 1,000's of ACORN-supplied phony follower accounts.
You see Harriet Baldwin uses the same entirely unsubstantiated generalization:
More from their trolls:
We had to include this from always-looped-in Clarence, who, while Senator Ted Cruz made his speech on the Senate floor, spent the entire 24-hour cycle almost exclusively
Note here that he sarcastically interjects himself to blunt the message from me representing TPFA - the message being to vote against cloture. Obvious liberal troll. This is Hogg's pal. He's one of Harriet's pals. He's one of Dakota's favorites
So who are these people leading the suspension charge and sending conservatives to Twitmo? Why it appears to be none other than Dakota Rose Lexliewis888, "Surgical Strike Harriett" Baldwin, Boss Hogg BossHoggUSMC themselves and their followers! (HUGE hat tip to Kathy Amidon for catching this in the cacophony of endless Twitter characters by the billions)
How do they do it? How do they attack others the way they say I and others do to them? Well, they, as a group, spamblock the victims to twitmo/gulag. Spamblocking a single victim as a group activity triggers an account suspension in Twitter. Now it seems that not talking to them and putting a period "." in front of the "@" on each twitter handle renders this useless - I do both and have not seen Twitmo in a good few months at least. But Spamblocking in unison is how they knock people out people not doing those things. From Twitchy:
How do we know it's Hogg, Dakota Rose? Here's the obvious smoking gun(s). They and their group(s) are clearly behind it:
Get the picture? These people apparently use any excuse they can think of - "stalker" (no offense, but who would want to stalk whisky-throated Dakota Rose?); me presumably surgically attached to Kathy who are supposed to have nothing better to do than suspend some guy we never heard of before?.
Now this is interesting! Look who appears to be in the game! Actor James Woods!
"But - but - but, James Woods said bad things about Obama! He's a true conservative!"
Wanna bet? Who's been feeding you this spin-doctor diet of 100% pasteurized bullshit? Look at his 2008 political campaign contributions:
Now, I don't know what universe you live in, but where I come from, Democrat Langevin and Uber-RINO Olympia Snow are not exactly competing with Ted Cruz for the love of the Tea Party. Yet, IMO the appearances these days is that someone has been spinning Woods as some kind of Conservative actor hero. Do you feel that way from the social media these days? I do.
Officially, Langevin's liberal voting record is twice as high as his Conservative ranking:
Snow, from "Conservapedia":Olympia J. Snowe (b. 1947) is a former Republican United States Senator from Maine. She is a liberal on many current issues and calls herself a moderate. She supports abortion, gay rights and amnesty for Illegal Aliens. In fiscal matters and on defense, Snowe is somewhat conservative, though she rejected fiscal sanity, voting nay on Cut, Cap and Balance.
So we have people all here who are very tightly connected, clearly. The foorsoldier trolls doing the dirty work, their higher ups, also doing the dirty work, their celebrities like "Surgical Strike Harriet" Baldwin - calling for people to do the dirty and work and now actor James Woods volunteers, apparently, to Harriet Baldwin, a block maneuver. Now one might think that I have been bugging Harriet directly that any blocking would be necessary. The problem is I normally blocked (not suspension-causing spam-blocked) Harriet and have not looped her in for months. In fact, we had to unblock her to catch these screenshot moments. I can only deduce, in my opinion, that Woods gave his own little contribution to the Twitter suspension operations against conservatives, for whom his contribution record obviously suggests he probably has no love.
You can mix and match these connections any way you want:
Democrat Langevin = Woods = Baldwin = Hogg = Dakota et al
Wicked Huntress = Dakota = Hogg = Baldwin = Woods = RINO Snow.
Are you getting the picture?! Things are probably not as you have been led to believe. Unfortunately, it may be much worse. "
Well Bo Snerdly, Rush Limbaugh's right-hand man appears to really really like... Harriet Baldwin.
He also really likes.... James Woods, whom he retweeted while Woods, who is clearly not a conservative, was playing one on twitter. This is interesting because I know he has never said a thing about TPFA and my knowledge has not said anything about Overpasses To Impeach Obama - on other words., activists who do something besides politically-harmlessly complain (Obama did win re-election, as you recall).
So - back to Woods, please keep a scorecard - what is Woods doing talking like this when he is donating to democrats and ultra-liberal republicans? I don't know, but I find it unsettling that he postures like he did, above, while offering Harriet Baldwin a new way to block the founder of the Tea Party Fire Ants - Harriet, a person clearly engaged on some level in the mass spamblocking of conservatives to suspend their twitter accounts.
So you can form an opinion like this if you want, like I am beginning to:
Rush's right-hand man Snerdly = Harriet = Woods = Democrat Langevin and ultra-liberal Snow
Things could be very bad and it's all happening right under your noses. My own opinion is that they are probably laughing at the conservatives who hold them in such regard. You see the un-doctored screenshots. Doubtless you have seen Bo happily retweet Harriet, Harriet calls Woods a good friend, and Harriet is with Hogg who is with Dakota, etc al, and except for Bo, all have been caught on screenshots apparently involved in this Twitter account-blocking suspension operation of conservative accounts, though Woods' connection may be more tenuous than the others, though the way Harriet responds to Woods' apparent voluntary offering and the way he responds back is, IMO, suspicious as hell.
Many among their number will mock all this, of course. But conservatives know hollow mockery with no facts when they hear and read it, and so far that is all the trolls have offered.
My own opinion is that things, while looking very good on HRes36 and some congressmen looking into Obama's personal records behind-the-scenes, appear to absolutely horrible for Conservative on social media. When a guy with a donation record like Woods gets a respected foothold in the conservative social media, we are in the deepest trouble imaginable.
What do we do? I suggest people politely ask Woods on twitter to explain himself. he's an outspoken public figure - why not? As for me, obviously from my own experience I have rejected him utterly as anyone to listen to for a moment - obviously.
Back to the suspensions in general. It is quite clear that I was right about something else - Hogg, etc are obviously spamblocking themselves via surrogates so as to play the "victim/martyr". This is a variation of an old, old trick which Putin, Islamic Terrorist etc do: create a false enemy to solidify their power base and make sure there are "victims" to anger their followers into taking action. It's also pretty harmless compared to what Nazi spies would do; murder one of their own to prove to the allies that they were on the side of the allies.
I mean, think for one moment, seriously: They say we are "frauds" while they know perfectly well about this short version list of Tea Party Fire Any accomplishment and recognition (of which they have zero to show for themselves). I put these things up against any tea party group. Do you agree with what we have done? Do you disagree with people who know what we have done and attack and spamblock our accounts into suspension?
Dakota, Hogg, Harriet and the rest are plainly lying through their teeth in a way that defies any explanation except, in my opinion, that they are very tremendously not nice people. They know every move we make (in fact, they often claim moves for us we didn't make). The obvious answer, IMO, is they are working from the other side. It does not matter what you have been led to believe up to now. Read all this again. And again. And again. Until the doubt that makes you think "misunderstand" could account for it evaporates and you have come to a solid conclusion. What is the conclusion?
Here's mine (need I explain it?):
I implore you for the sake of your country, if you follow these people, to unfollow them, walk away and shake the habit of chatting merrily in a big plastic bubble while American goes to hell in a handbasket - and they facilitate that destruction by suspending accounts of activists while keeping everyone else busy with fantasies and imaginary enemies. Instead, learn new ways and get active! Tweet your Reps - and not the way they do it, which is meaningless, but this way, the TPFA way, which creates public pressure and works:
The time for living among the lion and scarecrow and other fantasies is over. We need to get serious about winning this thing, now. Following guys clearly caught red-handed spamblocking people will ruin this country bit by bit as surely as any Obama-created national cancer.
Now you have the evidence of who has been behind the conservative suspensions. The evidence is right there in front of you. Absorb the shock if you've been taken in by Dakota, Hogg, Harriet and their people. Accept it, and take a new path. Following those people only helps Obama. Deal with the reality of it now.
Tweet congress every night with #TPFA. We make no money from it - TPFA is entirely volunteer - and even this blog intentionally has not a single advertiser where I could be making good money from it, now. This is for America. #TPFA will never betray the cause like, IMO, the people above. Time is running out for me to convince you against the momentum their numbers have created. We need you now to close the sale on Benghazi to congress.
If you don't, never complain about Obama again. Your complacency is your contract with Obama to never do anything but empower him and condemn your children to live in the world as a spoiled, communist community organizer would have it.
America needs your energetic, activist help. Now. Today.
Join us on Twitter #TPFA and/or follow @Kathy_Amidon every night 7:15 PM EST to tweet congress as a group. We're out of time. America is out of time. This is important.
UPDATE, OCT 6, 2013!
This blog simply had to post these latest screenshots, which I believe you find both educational and entertaining, even if they make your blood boil a bit. If you have read all of the above, they need little in the way of explanations:
To begin with, the above-mentioned and their pals have really upped their attacks in recent days as we press them hard - but fairly - on Twitter to explain the screenshots. Now, to read them, you'd think I was monstrously unpopular among conservatives, right? So to put a little perspective here for balance, lest anyone reading already have wondered on Twitter (not the most amazing but not bad), here are a couple of screen shots off my twitter account:
Here's Boss Hogg seeming not asking but ordering his followers to spamblock:
Here are 4 people chosen at random IMO seeming acknowledging compliance to the order (unbelievable)
Harriet. "InstaBlock" again, Oct 6:
And yes, people are influenced by this kind of thing. I'm pretty sure "Tag Team" is another term for "group spamblocking" to send someone into suspension, but I'd be happy to be corrected.
Even after many years dealing with tough people in a tough business in the toughest city on earth, I have to say that I regard following, in my opinion, to be simply gross and alarming. If there are people out there who regard "Boss Hogg" as a representative sample of Tea Party conservatives, it's no wonder so many mainstream/centrist Republicans worry about us. I use tough language and have been know to say Goddamn" and "Jesus Christ" (pardon me), but IMO the following by Hogg, a seeming representative sample, is simply off the chart. People may want to consider this when dealing with Hogg, his close followers or if you follow him:
I find it particularly weird that we read, written with seeming steam-level fury, the remark "You have a lot of nerve to question me and side with fake personas..." coming from a guy named "Boss Hogg".
In the meantime, since this entire situation was researched and then reported in our defense after the people above attacked us first, we will continue to ask them on Twitter to.... "EXPLAIN THE SCREENSHOTS" of the seeming calls to spamblock conservative accounts into suspension. IMO it's the least of the questions they should be called upon to answer.