Saturday, November 15, 2014

Tea Party Fire Ants / Stamp Out Tolls Tapped by Congress as Advisors on Congressional Investigation of Twitter/Truthy

The title of this post pretty much says it all. To those of you who have followed this blog for awhile, you know how badly we were attacked by trolls for getting things like this (we won't publish them all - again -  you know the drill):

All the Fire Ants were defamed by trolls on Twitter, many TPFA received threatening DM's - on Twitter; someone who goes by  Stan Hjerleid Tweeted a map to Kathy Amidon's unlisted residence while impuning her virtue and a plainly thinly veiled death threat of a gravestone with our names on it; and Kathy was subjected to, IMO, truly twisted telephone messages by a certain Kristen Snow White, messages which in my opinion are better suited to the Manson Family then to Twitter users whose accounts Twitter still merrily hosts despite innumerable complains to "Delbius" Harvey, head of Twitter's euphemistic "Trust and Safety.

This group has been slandered, defamed, threatened and - here's the big question mark - suspended by Twitter's apparently politically far-left safety department while those who would terrorize people and ruin lives run amok on the social network platform in which the horror show masquerades as a pretty blue bird so harmless to look at that one is disinclined to believe that such a nightmare exists inside the platform.

Here are a few of our articles

Our guide to Online Trolls

Detailing Our First significant attacks by Trolls

Our Thanks to World Net Daily For Covering Our Troll Adventures and lending a Hand In Exposing the Problem

TPFA Demands An Apology from "Conservative leader" Harriet Baldwin For Repeatedly Untruthfully Stating That Our Legit letters from Rep Wolf Were Fakes, When they Are Legit (We Never Got The Apology From Baldwin Who Seemed To Delight In Repeatedly Describing This Group in Foul-Mouthed Epithets)

There were many of these about the Trolls. Here are a couple more appropriate to our being tapped as advisors to the Congressional Science Committee's investigation of Twitter Trolls, the possibility that Twitter is suspending conservatives out of gross and malicious political prejudice against them and if Truthy is a direct an intentional extension of that activity. 

We ask Twitter publicly why Kathy Amidon's account, @Kathy_Amidon with its 6,000 followers was suspended while the trolls have been allowed for years to run amok and defame and terrorize anyone they wish with apparent impunity - as long, in our opinion, as the victims are conservatives. Trolls cite the fact that Kathy Tweeted that the trolls who have been terrorizing her were acting like Nazis insomuch as Nazis were sadistic psychopaths and so, too, are trolls, according to new respected psychology studies. That was Kathy's apparent big breaking of Twitter rules - in defense of herself and an attempt to shut the trolls up. The fact that the trolls keep posting that moment of "transgression" with certainty is one of the many reasons why, in our opinion, we believe that the Twitter trolls are operating in collusion with the Twitter safety department, since they cite that comparative minor "infraction" with such certitude as being the reason she was suspended and forced to lose her 6,000 followers - followers who were applauding her conservative messages.

To Trolls: Obama Will Not Write You a Pardon. This title now seems to take on a more significant meaning, one of which we warned the trolls about long ago. As Obama's former pastor/spiritual advisor Jeremiah Wright would say, "The chickens are coming home to roost."

And of course, the most salient one: The Tea Party Fire Ants demand That House Oversight Investigate Twitter. The trolls will say our demands had nothing to do with the current investigation by the House. That leaves the trolls, however, it seems to us, groping for an explanation as to why TPFA/Stamp Out Trolls have been tapped as significant advisors to the investigation. Maybe Harriet Baldwin, who accused our three legit letters of thanks from Rep Wolf to be fakes, can offer an alternative explanation.

So far we have had very friendly, productive and, frankly, cathartic discussions with the House investigators - several, in fact, in just the last week. They are not fooling around - and neither are we.

As points of interest arise of which we may speak freely, we shall report all to you, dear readers.

To the trolls, we warned you and we warned you. Stop the harassment. Stop the threats. Stop the stalking and the defamation and the attacks. But you merrily defamed and threatened and stalked and attacked to your sick, sadistic joyous little hearts' content. We warned you that we had the ear and respect of many in Congress. You denied it. We warned you that the investigations were coming. Some of you wisely fled while others remained confident that there would be some kind of force-field  around you that would protect you from the power of Congress. And now the time has come to face the reality that no such protection has ever existed, and if anyone told you there was, they were, IMO, lying to you. Plainly.

Trolls, whatever happens to you because of this investigation, remember two things: 1., you were warned and 2., you brought it on yourselves. 

To the vast majority of nice readers out there, please also visit and please donate generously. TPFA is working with congress to Stamp Out Trolls as we promised you we would. The time is come. And to you genuine conservatives - and anyone else - who has been maligned, defamed, suspended, terrorized and threatened, your day of justice is on the horizon under the power of the only legal authority to offer it: the GOP-led U.S. House of Representatives. 

Tune in often and we will let you know any developments as soon as we can offer them publicly. 

This is a spectacular moment for free speech. The trolls are on the run and the arguable agency that has enabled them freely while suspending conservatives is now on the very serious hot seat. Celebrate!

Please also check out our sister site which is about nothing but the fight against leftist twitter trolls and the agencies which may be enabling them:  

and check out our video about Twitter 

Click on the youtube link to see the larger version on Youtube

Wednesday, September 17, 2014


All images and quotes used via the Fair Use Act

Many of us in the Tea Party Fire Ants worked and waited a long time for this. If you have been following this blog for the last 22 months you know how long and hard so many have worked. I won't repeat it all here again, just read back a few posts to see the toil and sweat many people with TPFA put in for this moment. 

The first of presumably many hearings are currently scheduled to stream live on the internet via CSPAN 3 today, Sept 17, 2014. If you do not see it on CSPAN 3 starting around 10 AM, check to see if it has been moved to another channel (they have 3 online)

On this matter,  A BIG SHOUT OUT TO TPFA'S CO-LEADER KATHY AMIDON. This is a little thing on the surface, but little things can make a difference, and it is absolutely a perfect example of the mindset at TPFA, and we're proud of that mindset: to get things done. 

Kathy called CSPAN to find out when the hearings would be scheduled because they were not listed. Well, it turned out they were listed but CSPAN listed the event with wording so obscure and oblique that the words "Benghazi", "Select" or "Committee" were not even mentioned in the listing. After explaining who she was, the group and our association with Rep Wolf on this issue, Kathy informed them that they must change the listing so it read in a way that made sense for average viewers and at least get the word Benghazi in there. 

Low and behold, CSPAN did just that within 30 minutes:

Little steps, big steps, as long as they all point to justice on the issue of Benghazi. Well done, Kathy!

All other blogs and chat sites will report and gab about the commonly-known facts, but TPFA and this blog have never been about re-stating what everyone else says; we like to give you a little something of value you may not get anywhere else for the gracious time you allow us. So here are some new perspectives, in no order, to add to your consideration of Benghazi, the investigation of Benghazi, and the trolls who want anything but an investigation of Benghazi.

1. To begin with, take your info from the source. Here is the Government page on Benghazi run by the Republican House - in other words, the good guys in all this. This announcement was today, Sept 16, 2014:

2. Gowdy appears to be doing exactly what a prosecutor who never lost a case does: building his case slowly and methodically. It is clear that Gowdy does not want headlines, he wants to win the case. What case? The case of why a President lied about the cause of the killings. A case about why he has been secretive to the point of seeming paranoia about any facts about Benghazi. A case as to why the survivor witnesses who were on the ground have either been in a few instances silenced, and in the rest of the cases, gone missing.

3. Yes the democrats are in a panic. Their anxiety is so intense that it has now taken on the practical effect of a dog whistle; above the pitch of human hearing, but sending their subhuman, animal-like  propaganda activists  scurrying in every direction. Some notable cases in point:

1. On Twitter, they are posting like crazy telling people the first hearings are on Thursday, not today, Wednesday. In other words, they want you to miss the first day of hearings, which occurs today, Wednesday, Sept 17, 2014 at 10Am EST and can be seen streaming live on C-Span 3. So there, trolls!

2. The democrats/liberals are in full-swing in terms of protecting Obama on Benghazi. here are few (we are not including live links - go to their dank dens of misinformation, if you dare, on your own):

George Soros-funded Media Matters is reduced to calling the Benghazi scandal a "hoax"! (Their word, not mine!).

Media Matters says that Fox News is taking credit for the select committee when in fact Boehner was pushed by fellow GOP congressman to establish a select committee on Benghazi. This part is actually partially true. Fox News had damn little to do with it, frankly. If you recall, TPFA boycotted Fox with demands for more coverage as the centerpiece of the boycott! (click image for video)

What Media Matters fails to mention is that Boehner was pushed into it when the number of co-sponsors for Rep Wolf's bill swelled to a bursting 190, and that was done in great part by a little group which made Benghazi the focus of it's efforts for 17 months, every day (yes, we're bragging - happily and loudly. What are you going to do about it? :)

The euphemistically-named "Benghazi Research Center" has a blog which is, IMO, plainly nothing more than a propaganda hit-piece against the Republicans who are leading the charge for truth. It's hilarious but also shows you the, IMO, the dangerous lengths the left will go to in an effort to silence the truth and mislead people away from the facts. As a lifelong student of media history as well as a longtime professional media  practitioner, I have to say that lengths of disinformation this gross IMO positively reek of Nazi Germany and Stalin's Communist Russia; where such people spread disinformation on this scale, people must be alert to the kinds of acts that history has proven follows such manifest disinformation. 

Never say, "It cannot happen in this enlightened age" or "it cannot happen here." Those were the same words the intellectual elites used to dismiss the warnings of Hitler and stalin until the streets ran deep in their own blood. 

This blog, Benghazi-Truth, has been here since practically the beginning of this Benghazi outrage. Where was the absurd leftist mouthpiece "Benghazi Research Center" then?!

The House democrats have launched their own blog about Benghazi which basically states, no joke, "the questions about Benghazi have all been answered." Incredible.

I don't know how these people can show their faces in public, seriously. I suppose they forgot this question: "Where are the missing Benghazi Survivor Witnesses"?

3. Not all liberal news outlets are as absurd as the ones listed above. Liberal stalwart New York Daily News is reporting that Hillary had another shredding session, this time in the basement of the State Department Headquarters to destroy Benghazi documents. You have to hand it to Hillary: once she develops a behavioral pattern, she sticks with it.

4. We're very pleased that Rep Martha Roby is on the Benghazi select committee. She's no-nonsense and like Gowdy, she will leave no stone unturned as she makes clear in this Breitbart video:

Here Roby shows her courage again by signing onto Rice's HRes442 which now, or course, has become Boehner's lawsuit against Obama's constitutional overreach. Benghazi-Truth and TPFA love a Congressperson who puts truth-finding above D.C. Country Club politics. She's doing the job her voters sent her to Washington to do.


That's right. The news departments for television networks CBS, NBC and CBS are nowhere to be found in a search of the last 24 hours. In fact, you have to scroll back several pages to find any in the last week. And CSPAN is showing the hearings on CSPAN 3, and many places only have CSPAN 1 & 2. 

Call CSPAN and tell them you want the Benghazi hearings right up front on CSPAN 1. If they balk, remind them that the Watergate hearings were on all three networks gavel-to-gavel and no one was killed in Watergate.

CSPAN (202)737-3220 M-F 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM

Only a few short hours before the first of the Benghazi hearings and here is the earth-shattering news the three major networks are showing at the top of their political pages - and as of this writing not one mentions Benghazi anywhere on their pages.

If you enjoy beating your head against a wall with the mainstream media, you never know - it might be worth a try. We do:

CBS NEWS (212) 975-4231

NBC NEWS (212) 664-3720

ABC NEWS No phone they are willing to give out. here is a contact page:

It seems Obama is wagging the dog via Clinton and the mainstream television networks are obliging dutifully, lest Obama's poll numbers get any worse:

6. Saving the best for last, we would like to remind one and all who was the one champion in the entire U.S. Congress who kept fighting for Benghazi truth, for justice for the slain, for the rule of American law to be respected when so many others were ready to thrown in the towel on Benghazi amidst media apathy and leftist demagoguery:  

U.S. Representative Frank Wolf.

If anyone doubts the time and effort Rep Wolf put in to keeping awareness going of the need for justice for the Benghazi slain, see this:

True to the typical ways of RINO Speaker John Boehner, who TPFA would love see replaced as Speaker of the House by Rep Trey Gowdy, Wolf's contribution to an investigation which never would have occurred without him has been all but pushed aside as everyone from Fox News to Boehner himself behave in ways which are almost unconscionable in taking credit for the Benghazi select committee. It's truly nauseating. Sure, we take big, low bows, too, but at the end of the day, all should, as we do, recognize that it was for over a year only Wolf in Congress who stood firm and demanded action on Benghazi, and without his HRes36 and tireless efforts on behalf of the Benghazi dead and their families and a country to which Obama plainly lied, there would be no fact-finding about Benghazi today. Period. This is Wolf's achievement, and he should be thanked and honored for it.

Rep Wolf retires at the end of this year. He's a great, good man and an American hero. Drop by his Twitter page at @RepWolfPress and mention how much you appreciate his many years of honest and devoted service to our country.

Author of the Benghazi Select Committee.



Drop by often to read the latest!

Saturday, August 2, 2014


We love House Representative Trey Gowdy in equal but in a different measure as we love Representative Frank Wolf. They are the two halves of a team which can get to the bottom of Benghazi and see justice done, not only from without, but from within our own country.

Rep Wolf did his part: he stuck it out when so many others turned a blind eye; others who were ill-equipped, intellectually it seemed, to deal with the complexities and potential nightmare scenarios that digging deep into any issue sometimes unearths. But that's life in the real world and we do not elect and pay our Representatives to live well in austerity and do nothing - we pay them to handle the political dirt of our country while dressed in tailored suits and to do so diligently and without whine or complaint. Period.  

Wolf, a generally quiet man, self-effacing and terrifically honorable - an example to everyone, really - kept the light alive when everyone, including essentially all Democrats and many Republicans, were prepared to forget about Benghazi and move on. As he nears the end of his final term before self-imposed retirement, we wish him well, here, and will continue to honor him on this site as he nears the moment when he walks down the steps of The Capital Building for the last time as an active member of Congress, though he will always be Representative Frank Wolf to us.

Gowdy is now the man in the center of the action for a Benghazi Select Committee, as he is the Chairman, and we are delighted at the choice. This is no small thing for us as you can imagine - we/TPFA worked every single day for 17 months campaigning on Twitter and to a lesser extent in other media to see the Benghazi Select Committee happen, despite stonewall opposition from RINO House Speaker John Boehner. If you are a regular reader here, you know the drill. If not, click on each image for the larger version to read these thank you letters to us from Congressman Wolf .

 Now we really love Rep Gowdy. He has the no-nonsense, surgical precision of exactly what he was before joining Congress: a highly skilled southern prosecutor who never lost a case. This is not Ken Starr redux. Don't ever worry about Gowdy not eating the opposition alive - you might as well hand him the toothpick before he starts. Gowdy is the right man for Benghazi, and this country is damn lucky to have him, because he is unique among Congressmen as a prosecutor at his level of success.

But there has been an omission from his statements which has TPFA deeply concerned: while he mentions Hillary Clinton and all the attention-getting star witnesses whose very appearance before Congress will be a reality-show drama of catfights and gossip - just what the American entertainment audience loves, and so their inclusion serves an additional purpose to call attention to the murders in Benghazi - Gowdy has thus far failed to mention the importance, first and foremost, of getting the names of the Benghazi Survivor  Witnesses and having them testify. We are not alone in this concern: 3,000-plus retweets on Twitter is no small thing for an otherwise seemingly forgotten political issue, and the same person cannot just click retweet over and over, every retweet represents a unique individual. This one has over 3,000 retweets for a sum total of a minimum estimate of 14 million views:

Hillary will make a show. Others will range from comical to somber. The media, in an effort to protect Obama, will make the whole thing look like a tax-wasting political witch hunt designed to bolster GOP chances in the upcoming November midterm elections and unless the American people get a hard and rattling dose of reality the media will be successful. 

There is only one thing that will sober up the minds of the American people to this horror called Benghazi: the testimony of the people who were there and saw it all. And it is high time that the average citizens - coddled into a false sense of security about the Obama administration by a protective media and an endless stream of childish diversions from reality shows which are as staged as any drama to cute kitten videos on the internet - got a rattling dose of reality. 

Obama clearly does not want these people, who should have been the first to testify in the last hearings. The witnesses should have been the first to be called, well before Hillary "I fhew down ann hurd my widdoo head" - "What difference does it make?" Clinton. Since Clinton tied things up for months recuperating from a terrible concussion while she carefully and methodically compiled a dictionary-sized list of pre-written responses from which she was allowed to read in lieu of legitimate courtroom-style testimony, there was plenty of time for all 33 survivor witnesses to testify. Repeatedly. They were never even called to say a word, which is an absolute mind-blower.

Here's the problem: it appears that no one knows - including Congress - after almost two years who they are or even if they are still alive, and the most unnerving thing is that it appears that that is exactly the way Obama wants it. 

We have told you here before that the "33" number of witnesses has been repeated by congress - Hillary testified that there were at least 25 rescued from the Annex in Benghazi - and that according to Rep Jason Chaffetz, Congress is usually apprised of the identities of such people within 48 hours. The mystery of the identities of the Benghazi Survivor Witnesses - and what they saw - which should have been resolved within 48 hours is now nearing 48 months.

The worst part of all is that it Obama's Administration has said that the Benghazi Witnesses have been ordered to sign non-disclosure agreements, been given identities and moved around the country. Just like that - to give up their friends and live a lie of an identity, they and their families - spouses and kids - for the rest of their lives.

WAIT A MINUTE! IN AMERICA?! That's what they did in the old Soviet Union to shut up witnesses. That's what they often said, anyway, when later documents would prove that in most cases the witnesses, their families and associates were murdered to shut them up.

It is impossible to think that after 2 years not a single one of the witnesses wanted the truth to be known. or a book deal. or an ex-spouse, or mother or father or brother or sister or friends, ex-worked - someone - would say, here is so-and-so. And what of those kids who were presumably yanked from their schools and friends and told, "Your name is now such and such, this is your history, memorize it and tell everyone this is who you are or you are in big trouble, young man - our lives depend on it." I don't believe it, and if that's what happened, it's a the worse free-speech nightmare ever known in the country that prides itself, most of all, on freedom. these people were free citizens of the United States. This cannot happen, and that is so far the best scenario, which has been offered by the Obama Administration, itself.  

Not to mention that it is truly absurd to think you can have a murder investigation without calling in the witnesses to testify. Let's get real about this, come down to earth and simply remember the common-sense mindset of our own culture in this regard:

We bring this up because Congress seems lost in all the high-minded political confusion. Oh, these poor souls, an election looming, media saying this and that, campaign rides, "Did I just kiss a baby with hepatitis B?" You can see where they might lose track of the fact that YOU CANNOT CONDUCT A MURDER INVESTIGATION WITHOUT THE TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES IF WITNESSES EXIST, AND THEY DO.... OR AT LEAST, THEY DID, AND IF THEY DO NOT, WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM MUST BE IMMEDIATELY DETERMINED ASAP AND MADE PUBLIC TO THE PEOPLE WHOSE MONEY PAYS FOR ALL THIS.

The other road in which to go is much darker and we don't like it. Were the witnesses killed to shut them up? That sounds like the kind of thing LSD-filled leftists were saying about Nixon in 1972. The problem is, as you saw in the video clip of Fox News, the Obama Administration seems to have admitted that they gave them new names and moved them around. However, that is how you protect witnesses up until the point that they testify - you don't demand people take on new lives, their spouses and children say goodbye to friends and live under the burden of a fictional identity for the rest of their lives. That has never happened in the United States except to the occasional compromised agent, and these people were civilians whose only involvement was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. This is no joke. This is the real deal.

Such a "terrible" thing might seem impossible to the American mind. But America has been living on borrowed time statistically when it comes to unpleasant things happening at the top. The rest of the world - every single major player - has had to deal with the fact that in its history books are people and acts millions of times worse than this, for perspective:

Germany, a fine country of no-nonsense realists - had Hitler, who during just a few years in the mid-20th-century murdered 6 million German Jews; Russia - steeped in old-world splendor - had several murderers who soil their grade-school history books (or should), including Ivan The Terrible as well as the Communist Stalin in the 20th century, the latter of which murdered 40 million of his own people in the purges; England, from which this nation sprung initially, had Richard the Third, who murdered his way up to the throne and Henry the Eighth, while known mainly for his six wives, had created spy/execution network believed to have murdered 70,000 people, including two of his own wives, and also had Oliver Cromwell, whose aggressions against Catholics in Scotland and Ireland are generally described historically a genocidal; France's history books have Napoleon, whose idea of a stable peace was aggression in pursuit of global domination with himself master of the world, and Maximilien Robespierre, who killed approximately 40,000 French citizens in his famous "Reign of Terror" from which the expression sprang; Japan had 20th-century Prime Ministers Tojo and Hirota, found guilty of war crimes during WWII and both executed by hanging; 20th-century Italy had Mussolini, who is reported to have murdered 300,000 of his own countrymen; Spain's 20th century had Franco, who killed thousands, made catholicism the only accepted religion and confessed to having 26,000 political prisoners under lock and key; 20th-century Mexico had Diaz,who imprisoned his political opponent, declared himself de facto winner of the election and dissolved all localized power, making himself the supreme authority, with many corpses face-down along the way; and topping the democide list is China's 20th-century Communist Chairman Mao who is generally regarded as being responsible for a positively nauseating  70-million deaths of his own countrymen in peacetime due mostly to concentration camps and purge executions. Add to this essentially every single significant player country in the world and many more insignificant had their own murderers at the top, from Pol Pot to Saddam Hussein.

This is what kids learn, more or less, from their history books growing up in other countries. We never had that and as a consequence refuse the unhappiness of being a little more wary about that which unpleasant politicians are capable. 

Now don't get us wrong - we're in no way suggesting that Obama murdered or ordered to be murdered anyone to silence them. But given the history of the world and the fact that the United States appears to now be living on statistical borrowed time in this regard, one thing is for sure:



Sunday, July 27, 2014


Images used via the Fair Use Act.

To cut to the chase, scroll down and read the notations in RED beneath  the name of each of the Twitter Executives covered here. All the Executives listed on the Twitter Executive  page as of this writing are listed here. Be prepared for a shock. It's worse than you think. 

It's funny how things grow in the summer.

This all started, of course, when we, the Tea Party Fire Ants, started to become genuinely effective in driving some areas of media and congress. If you are a regular reader, you know the story.  At that point trolls descended on us like locusts, and you know what we mean by trolls: leftists pretending to be conservative to fill the air with meaningless distractions and try to ruin effective conservatives by destroying their reputations with slander and innuendo and frighten them off with alarmingly aggressive attacks and death threats. Our trials and tribulations have more recently been covered by World Net Daily HERE and HEREand the Tea Party News Network, HERE.

Then came our initial call to Congress to investigate twitter, since Congress has private business oversight authority, and if the need is serious, they will act. HERE. With 250 million users, continual reports of conservatives  being harassed, cyber-bullied  and threatened is serious. Nationally serious.

And then, when things simply appeared outrageous in terms of the way Twitter was applying their own user rules grossly unfairly, seemingly because of political prejudice, came our challenge to Twitter and it's so-called Chief of Security, Delbius Harvey, to explain why conservatives are suspended and those who attack them are allowed to run wild on their social network. HERE

In researching this last one, I began to seriously wonder, "Why would anyone hire or promote Delbius Harvey for or to that position in the first place?" She has no prior security background and indeed before Twitter appears to have no work history at all except for what was initially a small "club" of sorts called "Perverted Justice", which spent its collective evenings trolling for pedophiles online for fun and, eventually, profit (literally). Could it be, we here wondered, that Harvey was not hired in spite of her slim resume that amounts to basically trolling and humiliating online pedophiles, but, indeed, because of it? Could it have been that experience of trolling and the humiliation of targeted individuals that Twitter was actually looking for, so that their new Chief of Security could implement similar strategies not, this time, to pedophiles, but to political conservatives?

That's a cynical idea to be sure - a real nightmare on the scale that would be manifest by a social network as large as Twitter. Such a company would have to be populated at the highest level by probably younger people and really be ultra-hard-core activist left wing democrats in a big way for that to be possible. If true, however, the need for a congressional investigation would need to be immediate, because that would mean, right here in the US, there is a propaganda juggernaut hiding their false flag ops among a crowd of 250 million and engaging willfully in any number of crimes by the thousands every day on a mind-blowing scale, from cyber-bullying, to harassment, to death threats. On Twitter we have endured all three, and while our accounts have been suspended by Harvey and/or her staff for the slimmest of violations - if any, they never tell us why - the people who did those things to us have not been suspended, and after all the media about it, Harvey must know it by now, since we tweeted the articles to her ourselves. And we are by means whatsoever alone.

Here's the shock: It seems that Twitter is indeed comprised of exactly the, presumably, IMO, hard-core activist leftists who would be needed in executive positions for such a theory to be potentially borne out. By activist leftists I don't mean people who still have faded Obama bumper stickers on their cars. I mean the real deal.

It is fast becoming my opinion that when it comes to cyber-bullying and suspensions, Twitter's part in those horrendous activities does not appear to be accidental, but organized and deliberate, and carried out by employees on a daily basis.

Remember, as you read this, also, that Reuters reported that Obama deployed a "Twitter Army" ...

of what Reuters reported amounts to basically online propagandists engaged in "public shaming", seemingly following the instructions of Cass Sunstein*. Not a Facebook or blog army. A Twitter army.

The question we have, then, given the way Del Harvey and her crew appear to be suspending conservatives and giving those who cyber-bully and humiliate and threaten conservatives a free pass, is, "Is Obama's Twitter army recruited from without, or is it already structured and put in place among Twitter's 1,300 workers?" At this point we feel that it's an absolutely legitimate question. And it needs to be investigated by Congress before, not after, that hypothetical propaganda structure effects the 2014 midterm elections this November, aside from the basically humanitarian and first amendment concerns involved.

HERE FOR YOUR EDUCATION AND CONSIDERATION ARE THE TWITTER EXECS on the Twitter website page that lists the executives (and a couple past and unmentioned). None have been excluded - we did not cherry-pick the politically active liberals for effect. This is the list and, via our research of public material, their political leaning and connections to Obama, in, what we believe is for the first time, one nice, neat little collection.


Stone was a co-founder, and though he has left, he gave one suggestion to them via the media: "Maybe the Twitter of the future will have an entire news department dedicated to verifying the truthfulness of the Tweets. It could have another department just for fun, for chatting."

In other words, as we read it, play God and edit and censor what Twitter users say about the news - and that includes politics.

Couple that with Stone joining ultra-left Huffington Post while still at Twitter to "...advise The Huffington Post Media Group and all of AOL on social impact and cause-based initiatives, develop a platform to facilitate people doing service in their communities...."

Thois translates to us in context as "helping liberal politicians on online social platforms"

Another co-founder of Twitter, assuming various top leadership roles including CEO. 
"Twitter subtly reveals political inclinations by including quite a few liberal-leaning moments in Twitter history. For example, the video mentions the Egyptian revolution of 2011 and the most retweeted post of all time, which was a photo of President Obama hugging the First Lady with the caption “Four more years,” as significant moments in the company’s history."
"The Twitter town hall focused on Obama's work in creating jobs and fixing the economy. Users asked their 140-character questions with the hashtag #askobama, and a pre-selected team of "seasoned Twitter users" handpicked the best #askobama tweets for the president to answer.

Tough questions were in short supply, though, as the moderator of the town hall was Jack Dorsey, Twitter co-founder and close friend of the administration." -Newsbusters of obama's
Dorsey was a keynote speaker at the National Democratic Institute 30th anniversay dinner, a hotbed of rabid leftists of clout.


Williams is included here because of being important to Twitter's history but so far is reading politically neutral to us as far as public information goes

New CEO flew to Japan to help newly-elected liberal Japanese President to - apparently -help with his politics via Twitter
 "We have to leverage our critical mass of publishers to create network effects," he says. As an example, Costolo cites plans to allow publishers in the network to form "affinity groups" by blending their feeds together. He mentions the possibility that Daily Kos, Talking Points Memo, and a handful of other popular liberal political blogs might offer a joint feed--leading lefty readers to subscribe to that feed rather than to each individually. "Then the incentive for all of them would be high to stay in FeedBurner," Costolo says, "because as part of the liberal politics feed, they'd be reaching more people than they would on their own."

Here, like Dorsey, is a key player at Twitter, at the very, very top, who is directly involved with the Obama administration while continuing at Twitter.

"Last night, President Obama announced that he will name Costolo to the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC). Costolo has been CEO of Twitter since October, when he took over from co-founder Evan Williams."

Bear in mind we're not skipping anyone on Twitter's own list of top executives at twitter or in any other way cherry-picking certain Twitter executives for effect; this is how all the top people engage politics.

Gabriel Stricker, Chief Communications Officer
First off, in context, we'd like to know what the seeming hiding-in-plain-sight self-description of 
"Information Democratizer"
 means for the Chief Communications Officer. IMO, some of these people are arrogant to the point of cute, and in-context to the all the conservative abuse, appear to put their biases and prejudices up as a point of pride for everyone else at the company who seem to be in lock-step with the leftist traditions of the city in which they work. 

On the occasion of it's 8th birthday, Strickler posted to twitter's blog a notification of the occasion and then posted a list of first Tweets to mark the occasion, and the list is a who's who of liberal celebrities and politicians, including Obama, Hillary Clinton, very long-forgotten Madeleine Albright  and a long list of hard-core left celebrities including Oprah Winfrey. Notable conservative celebs and politicians just to, you know, let everyone know they are being fair? None. From Twitter's own blog:

Katie Stanton, Twitter media chief
"Previously at Yahoo and Google, 

Stanton also worked for the White House under President Obama and the State Department under Hilary Clinton. 

She has been at Twitter for four years, having moved from its San Francisco headquarters last year to spearhead expansion efforts for the company overseas. The new post will mean she is returning from Paris to San Francisco.

Stanton doesn't have the kind of media-heavy resume you might expect from someone in her new role. Prior to a stint at Yahoo Finance that ended in 2002, she did a six-year stint at Google that included roles at Google Finance and OpenSocial. She joined the Obama Administration in 2009 as director of citizen participation, which made the White House a more Web-friendly destination for voters. She segued a year later to the State Department as a special officer in its office of innovation, leaving for Twitter in 2010."

As you see, Twitter, IMO is beginning to look not like a publicly traded corporation, but like Obama's own personal propaganda social platform disguised as a micro-blogging service. In context, it's funny how Reuters reported that Obama was deploying a Twitter Army, and not a Google or Facebook army.

Mike Gupta, Chief Financial Officer
Public info on Gupta reads politically neutral, so far.

Adam Messinger, Chief Technology Officer
Occasional political tweets/retweets skew plainly to the left/hard left.

Alex Roetter, Vice President of Engineering
The only one on this list whose occasional political Tweets appear to stay center. We hope this article does not disenfranchise him from his leftist co-workers; His Tweets reflect the personality of an intelligent nice guy with adventurous interests.

Vijaya Gadde, General Counsel
Twitter's top lawyer has apparently been a 

regular Obama campaign donor since 2008.

Surprised? Bear in mind that she was from New Jersey and many others are likewise from around the country, so it isn't like Twitter is recruiting its execs from the local Bay Area liberal workforce. In our opinion, you have to vet your job candidates' political views pretty aggressively to get a top-brass from all around the nation who, once under one roof, uniformly appear so strongly devoted to left-wing politics.

Bt the way, here's a list that came up with Gadde of 25 of Twitter's campaign donors, only one of which is a Republican and he does not appear to work at the San Francisco main office. Twitter admitted recently that it has a diversity problem - yes it does! IMO everyone appears to be a hard-core activist/leftist.

Daniel Graf, Vice President of Product
No political bias on the surface

Adam Bain, President of Global Revenue
These were the only politically-themed tweets we could find for Bain in the last 12 months of Twitter for which he is President of Global revenue. Only these four were found which had a political theme, and they skew left.

Colin Crowell, Vice President, Global Public Policy
Part of his history, as reported at the Washington Post, "He spent two decades as a legislative aide to Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and worked on the Telecom Act of 1996 and other communications legislation."

And.... what?! We're still looking deeper into whatever this is and if it's legit:

And while the following is not political, it does, IMO, suggest that the corporate mindset at twitter is self-cenmtric to the point that it took tax breaks from the city and used the majority of those tax breaks to party, and that sounds, IMO, like the kind of mindset that perhaps also would not care, and might even prefer, if conseravatives, who are nowhere near management's own socio-political universe, are cyber-bullied and routinly suspended while those who torment them run free all over the site:

Kevin Weil, Vice President of Revenue Products

Tweets/retweets appear to skew left (we could not find him tweeting about or retweeting any Republicans)

Brian “Skip” Schipper, Vice President of Human Resources
Another person whose name came up in a general search as a democrat contributor. You know, not everyone who votes democrat is into it enough to donate.  See a pattern at Twitter?
Contributions to to Chuck Schumer, Patrick Murphy and Howard Dean, who are in our opinion truly aggressive, extremist left-wing democrats, and you quite possibly share that opinion.

Twitter: "Skip is responsible for leading the human resources team at Twitter, including setting the strategy and delivering the support to make Twitter the best company to work for."

In other words, as we read it, this guy who donates to aggressive liberal extremists like Schumer and Howard Dean is more or less the guy who is in charge of hiring people at Twitter, which is run by people who skew often hard left, a couple of whom are intimately involved in Obama's White House. 

AND THAT IS THE END OF THE LIST OF EXECUTIVES OFF THE TWITTER PAGE LISTING TWITTER EXECUTIVES. None were omitted for effect or any other reason. Most are very, very plainly left/hard left. There's only one centrist. There are none who are pro-right politically and a few of the people at the very top are actually involved in Obama's Administration. Get the picture? You can go to the Twitter exec page to confirm these people are who we say they are, HERE

And check out Twitter Execs' seeming drooling over having Hillary "What difference does it make" Clinton stop by for a Q&A. Any indication that Twitter will bring in a conservative politician who was not Secretary of State when Ambassador Stevens and 3 others were murdered in Benghazi and then lied about the cause of the murders? Not so far as we can tell: CLICK HERE

It may not be fair to bring this up because a party is a party, but contrasting how conservatives are  grossly mistreated on Twitter while Twitter's admins, IMO, employ a nightmarish double-standard to the proceedings, and the sense of total abandon demonstrated, IMO, in pictures of a Twitter party put on by Execs, needs to be at least a vaguely regarded consideration in this discussion. I'm sure these are good people, and all young adults party in one way or another. But the contrast between extremely concerned conservative patriots being so horrendously treated daily on Twitter and this kind of, IMO, irresponsible, wild-party atmosphere at an event hosted in 2011 by then-top Twitter executives Jason Goldman, Ev Williams and Biz Stone strikes me as relevant to the issue. I suppose the best way to articulate what bothers is me is to say if Twitter employees put half as much energy into ensuring that coservatives were treated fairly on Twitter as they seem to be expending at this party, then this blog memo would not have needed to be written at all:

The story at Business Insider, HERE.

 Concerned and well-meaning Conservatives have been cyber-bullied, stalked, had their  personal addresses given out with maps on how to get there, been subjected to barely-veiled death threats and harassed all to the apparent consent of Twitter safety and security. That's not "in my opinion". That's fact because that's a very short list of abuses to which members of the Fire Ants have been subjected; behavior which was witnessed and reported by legitimate objective media, and the Twitter accounts of the people who committed those acts, incredibly, remain active and unimpeded despite repeated complaints to Harvey and Twitter security. Those are mostly criminal charges and if Twitter is complicit then the corporation itself, IMO, shares the blame and IMO as a corporate entity should share the legal penalty. This is not fun and games, anymore, and the degree to which Twitter appears actively complicit - IMO and that of many others - deserves not more than a cursory glance to see that obvious complicity.

We will continue to communicate and work with congressional offices, and now with the facts that the top Twitter brass is ensconced cozily with Obama's White House and the general political left in one neat little package, we expect GOP Reps to share yet even more fully the same opinion we do; that the wholesale, sometimes criminal, abuse of conservatives on Twitter is no accident.

Why all these dots, hiding in plain sight, have not been connected by some media outlet or blog up until this moment, I cannot say. But IMO it's a few years overdue and the right-serving media needs to get a lot more aggressive; it should not have taken up until this point and this blog to point out the degree to which Twitter's top brass is tied into Obama's political machinery and investigate the resulting obvious opinions regarding the suspension and wholesale abuse of conservatives on Twitter in that context, and we challenge all conservative media and pundits to cover it. They can even pretend that it was their idea, if they want, just as long as they do it.  

You, Dear Reader, however, can do the biggest and best job of all and it's easy. Contact your local congressional representative by phone and/or on TWITTER, itself, today and say, "I want a House Investigation of Twitter and I want it now!"  

* "Cass Sunstein has long been one of Barack Obama’s closest confidants.  Often mentioned as a likely Obama nominee to the Supreme Court, Sunstein was Obama’s head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where, among other things, he is responsible for “overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs.”
"Sunstein advocates that the Government’s stealth infiltration should be accomplished by sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups.”  He also proposes that the Government make secret payments to so-called “independent” credible voices to bolster the Government’s messaging (on the ground that those who don’t believe government sources will be more inclined to listen to those who appear independent while secretly acting on behalf of the Government).   This program would target those advocating false “conspiracy theories,” which they define to mean: “an attempt to explain an event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”